Thoughts that could appear in the next text version:
(Last change: 2012-04-22)

Especially to 2.2, 4.1.1a, 4.1.2:
The „international parliamentary assembly“ with the „right to decide in one single important world economic issue“ will play a much lesser roll in the next version of this concept. I will remove the right from 4.1.2: „election of a single seat of a supervisory board (SB) partly by an international parliamentary assembly“.
In 2.2 beside global issues („world economy“) regional, national and international contexts shall play a bigger role.
For remaining tasks of the mentioned parliamentary assembly:
There is a Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly; initially this UN-parliament would only have an advisory role. If there really would be such a UN-parliament, from this we could create an assembly that consists of only a part of the delegates of the UN-parliament: only with delegates from countries that take part in this procedure for a better co-determination / democratic influence in/on big enterprises.

To „4.2 employees: distribution of 1/3 of the SB-seats by them“
According to 4.2.b half of the employee-representatives is elected by trade/labor unions. In most cases this is not necessary, so the following would be possible (all together):

• Directly elected by unions are less representatives by default (at least 1 representative).
• The workers of an enterprise can freely decide, whether their representatives that are not directly elected by unions come from inside or outside of the enterprise.
• To enable that half of the employee-representatives are directly elected by unions, in single cases this can be realized in union assemblies with 2/3 majority:
  • without time limit in a central international assembly
  • or with time limit in a smaller, subordinate assembly; there also faster decisions are to be possible.
  From the result of the last election of employee-representatives result both the candidates for additional seats for the directly by unions elected representatives and the representatives who loose their SB-seat.
  To take into accout that a SB normally has an uneven number of employee-representatives, for these single cases the following regulation is possible:
  If a SB normally has 5 employee-representatives, only 4 employee-representatives remain, 2 of them are directly elected by unions. Because this is used only for this special case, where the employee-representatives are divided into 2 opposing groups, the shortfall of a seat should be acceptable.